excodex

Occupational safety International framework and country guides

Question and answerEXC-OQA-0431

Is a written risk assessment mandatory in Canada, and how often must it be reviewed?

excodex editorial teamCanada

Part of: Occupational safety and health in Canada: law, authorities and employer duties

Short answer

Yes, in substance. Federal employers need a hazard assessment methodology, a record of hazards and a prevention programme evaluated at least every 3 years. Alberta requires dated written hazard assessments, repeated when work changes. Other provinces set their own rules.

Yes in substance, although the words and review periods depend on the jurisdiction. Federally regulated employers must have a hazard identification and assessment methodology, a record of hazards and a hazard prevention programme that is evaluated at least every three years, with a written evaluation report. Alberta requires a dated written hazard assessment before work begins, repeated when work changes. Ontario and Quebec use their own instruments.

Short answer

  • Federal (COHSR Part XIX): a methodology, hazard identification and assessment, record of hazards, preventive measures, training and a programme evaluation at least every three years and whenever conditions or hazard information change. Evaluation reports are kept for six years.
  • Alberta (OHS Code Part 2): hazard assessment before work begins, a written report with the date, repeated at reasonably practicable intervals, when a new work process is introduced, when a process or operation changes and before significant alterations. Affected workers must take part.
  • Ontario: no general written risk assessment duty in the act, but a written OSH policy reviewed at least annually (more than five workers), a programme, workplace violence risk assessments and written exposure assessments for designated substances.
  • Quebec: under the 2021 law modernising the regime, every establishment must have prevention and participation mechanisms; the health and safety committee (20 or more workers) takes part in identifying and analysing risks, and a liaison officer (19 or fewer) makes written recommendations on risk identification. The regulation on these mechanisms took effect on 1 October 2025.
  • In every jurisdiction, specific regulations require written assessments for particular hazards, such as confined spaces.

What the federal hazard prevention programme requires

Canada's federal regulations do not use the term "risk assessment", but Part XIX of the Canada Occupational Health and Safety Regulations (COHSR) sets out a complete cycle. The employer develops it with the policy committee, the work place committee or the health and safety representative:

  1. Implementation plan with a time frame for each phase.
  2. Hazard identification and assessment methodology, using investigation reports, first aid and minor injury records, inspection results, employee reports and the record of hazardous substances. It must set the steps and time frame, the keeping of a record of hazards and when the methodology itself is reviewed.
  3. Identification and assessment of each hazard, including ergonomics, considering exposure level, frequency and duration, health effects and existing controls.
  4. Preventive measures in this order: elimination (including engineering controls), reduction (including isolation), personal protective equipment, then administrative procedures. A preventive maintenance programme is part of this step.
  5. Training of employees on the programme and their hazards.
  6. Programme evaluation at least every three years, and also whenever conditions change or new hazard information becomes available, documented in a report kept for six years.

Other federal parts add specific written assessments, for example a confined space assessment by a qualified person, reviewed at least every three years (COHSR Part XI), and investigations of exposure to hazardous substances with a written report kept for 30 years (COHSR ss. 10.4 to 10.6).

Provincial approaches compared

JurisdictionWritten assessmentReview
FederalHazard identification and assessment within the prevention programmeProgramme evaluation at least every 3 years and on change
AlbertaHazard assessment report, dated, with control methodsAt reasonably practicable intervals and on changes in process or site
OntarioWritten policy and programme; workplace violence assessment; written assessment for designated substancesPolicy at least annually; violence assessment as often as necessary
QuebecPrevention programme or action plan; the committee takes part in identifying and analysing risks, a liaison officer recommends on risk identificationDeadlines set by the 2025 regulation; confirm with the CNESST

Example: A federally regulated logistics depot evaluates its hazard prevention programme in March 2026. The next evaluation is due by March 2029 at the latest, but in October 2026 the depot introduces automated guided vehicles. That is a change in conditions in respect of the hazards, so the employer must identify and assess the new hazards without waiting, update the preventive measures and training, and evaluate the programme again.

Common mistakes

  • Writing a generic risk matrix once and never linking it to incident records, inspections and employee reports, which the federal methodology must use.
  • Waiting for the three-year date after a change in process, equipment or layout.
  • Doing the assessment without the committee or representative: participation is a legal requirement in federal law and in Alberta.

Related on excodex

Standards and further reading

This article is general occupational safety and health information prepared by the excodex editorial team. It does not replace the applicable legislation, standards, manufacturers' instructions or the assessment of a competent OSH professional or occupational physician.

More questions on this topic

Part of: Occupational safety and health in Canada: law, authorities and employer duties

excodex

Tools

Ex check Gas library exai Occupational safety My files

Community

excodex

Join free

Language

Sign in

Not a member yet? Join free

Improve the translation